.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Rantings of a Sandmonkey

Be forewarned: The writer of this blog is an extremely cynical, snarky, pro-US, secular, libertarian, disgruntled sandmonkey. If this is your cup of tea, please enjoy your stay here. If not, please sod off

Sunday, February 13, 2005

Give the Iraqi voters the Nobel peace prize

Finally, a cause that i am willing to rally for, brought to you by Daniel Henninger at the opinionjournal : Give the Iraqi voters the Nobel peace prize! The Nobel Peace Prize Committee will announce its 2005 winner in October. I think that this year the voters of Iraq should receive the Nobel Peace Prize. They have already won the world's peace prize by demonstrating in a single day a commitment not seen in our lifetime to peace, self-determination and human rights--the goals for which the Nobel Peace Prize began in 1901. Formal recognition by the Nobel Committee of what the Iraqi people did on Jan. 30 would do more to ensure the furtherance of these goals, in concrete ways, than any other imaginable recipient this year. Who did more? The history of the Peace Prize shows as well that Iraq's voters placed themselves squarely at the center of one of the Nobel Committee's enduring, seemingly quixotic, goals--peace in the Middle East. ************************** There are sufficient practical reasons to elevate Iraq's voters in the eyes of the world. While eight million Iraqis stood against bombs to vote, millions sat in front of televisions in other nations, wishing for this opportunity. If it can happen in what was Saddam Hussein's Iraq, it may happen too in Yemen, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Jordan or Iran. Imagine the effect on the Arab street if its inhabitants saw that Arabs can win a Nobel Peace Prize, and the world's admiration, by casting votes as free men and free women. Not least, terrorism--its arguments and its methods--was rebuked. This is the peace "process" rightly understood. The Nobel Committee has never given the Prize to a nation. No matter. This is the new model for a new century: a whole nation choosing peace. Legitimize Iraq; others will want to follow. The Committee has another rule: Its deadline for nominees was Feb. 1. That makes this nomination a smidgen late. The Iraqi vote, however, was Jan. 30. The people of Iraq nominated themselves for the Nobel Peace Prize. There may be someone or something more deserving, but not in the world we live in. I am all for it. Who is with me?


At 2/13/2005 08:40:00 AM, Blogger Tina said...

I'm with you! If the prize means anything at all, the Iraqi people are the personification it.

At 2/13/2005 09:18:00 AM, Blogger Louise said...

Me too. Many of my heros are Nobel Peace Prize winners. These people are all heros because they went out and voted against great odds.

And, BTW, the results have been announced and I'm very happy no one got a clear majority. This will force everyone to do politics the way it should be done - through compromise and coalitions. I think this will make it easier to bring the Sunnis back in. This situation has happened in Canada on several occasions during my lifetime. The biggest party will have to adopt some of the more popular ideas of the smaller groups if they expect to maintain their position.

At 2/13/2005 12:14:00 PM, Blogger Kender said...

I am for this idea. Hey, Arafat won it didn't he? If memory serves and I am correct in that thought then the iraqi voters should win hands down. They did more for peace on Jan. 30th than Arafat could have done had he lived to 150 years old.

At 2/13/2005 01:50:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...



Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home