.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Rantings of a Sandmonkey

Be forewarned: The writer of this blog is an extremely cynical, snarky, pro-US, secular, libertarian, disgruntled sandmonkey. If this is your cup of tea, please enjoy your stay here. If not, please sod off

Tuesday, June 14, 2005

The Vatican is behind 9/11!

This is the transcript of an interview on the saudi islamic channel Iqra TV with Egyptian historian Professor Zaynab Abd Al-Aziz , where she stated that the Vatican's Mission of Destroying Islam was Delegated to the U.S. – which Carried Out 9/11 on Assignment by the World Council of Churches. What this woman says in that interview is just beyoned Parody! Abd Al-Aziz: "The decision to impose one religion over the entire world was made in the Second Vatican Council in 1965." Host: "Huh?" Abd Al-Aziz: "Yes. A long time ago." Host: "They decided to Christianize the world?" Abd Al-Aziz: "Yes. The decisions of the 1965 Vatican Council included, first of all, absolving the Jews of the blood of Christ. This decision is well known and was the basis for the recognition of the occupying Zionist entity - Israel. The second decision was to eradicate the left in the eighties. I believe we've all witnessed this. The third decision was to eradicate Islam, so that the world would be Christianized by the third millennium." Notice the sides this woman paints by this conspiracy: The Vatican (the christians) and the Jews on one side, the Left and Islam on the opposing side. Hmmm..... Ok, now just one question: if the Vatican really wants to christianize the world, why let the Jews off the hook? Last i checked, they are not christians, so why not declare the war on them as well? Host: "Why is America hostile to Islam, although we never had and never will have the same conflict with them we had with Europe?" Abd Al-Aziz: "Well, do you remember what we just said about the Second Vatican Council in 1965 and about Christianizing the world? It was agreed upon and pre-arranged. John Paul II prepared a five-year plan, on the eve of the third millennium, Christianize the world. His address in 1995 was based on the assumption that by the year 2000, the entire world would be Christianized. Since the plan was not accomplished, the World Council of Churches assigned this mission to the US in January 2001, since the US is the world's unrivaled military power. They named the decade between 2001-2010 "the age of eradicating evil" – "evil" referring to Islam and Muslims. Ohh, so it's John Paul II 's plan. Huh. And here i am thinking he died a Muslim. Shows you how little i know! And isn't it awesome that the Vatican yields so much power in the US, that they just assign missions to its government, which they dutifully carry on without questioning ? I mean, the fact that the US had only one Catholic President in its history must be just a cover, along with their inability to cover up their children sexual abuse scandals, and the whole Protestant christians movement thing and how they no longer follow the Catholic church in anything. Hmm, that's one hell of a cover. Must be why they needed the Jews' help! They must've been impressed with what they've done to Hitler and how they got the whole world to attack Germany. I would be, wouldn't you? "The Crusader war is ongoing, because it has been a religious war since the dawn of Islam. Later, colonialism, missionaries, and Christianization were introduced. The Crusader war is ongoing. The Inquisition courts exist to this day. As I told you, the pope who was appointed a few days ago, headed the Inquisition Court, which is now called the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. "When in January 2001, the World Council of Churches delegated this mission to the US - what did the US do? It fabricated the show of… is it September 9 or 11?" Host: "11. Please explain this to me." Yes, Please do! This should be great! Abd Al-Aziz: "Yes, of course…" Host: "You mean to say that the World Council of Churches delegated the mission of Christianizing of the world to the US." Abd Al-Aziz: "Yes. And how could the US win legitimacy for this without anyone saying that they are perpetrating massacres and waging a Crusader war? It fabricated the 9/11 show. I call it a fabrication because much has been written on this. We are also to blame. Why do we accept a single perspective? Countless books were written, some of which were even translated into Arabic, like Thierry Meyssan's 9/11 – The Appalling Fraud [2] and Pentagate. "Pentagate" like Watergate… He brings documents to prove that the method used in destroying the three (sic) towers was "controlled demolition. "This is an architectural engineering theory, which was invented by the Americans. They teach it in their universities. They make movies and documentaries about it. They incorporated it in movie scenarios and then carried it out in real life. Why do we accept this?" Host: "My God, doctor. This is unbelievable! You're saying that this destruction…" Abd Al-Aziz: "...was a controlled demolition. The building collapsed in its place, without hitting a single building to its left or right. The three towers fell in place." Okay, what about the planes hitting the buildings? Ehh, cause i am pretty sure i saw that happening, you know? Must've been some movie special effect then! Anyway, as far as that controlled demolition theory is concerned, well, it's been scientifically proven to be bullshit! Host: "In the same method they use in movies and plays?" Abd Al-Aziz: "Yes, Exactly like that. That is how the US won international legitimacy. You could sense the (9/11) operation was pre-planned because many things were revealed in the days that followed. For example 4,000 Jews caught influenza on that exact day. They set a timer, and all 4,000…" OH GOD! LOL...They set a Timer. LOL... That's just Great! Host: "By God, you crack me up! They all set a timer and got influenza on the same day. So the building was completely empty of Jews." Me too. You crack me up too. I am Rolling on the floor laughing my ass off listening to you. You are one hell of a funny woman! Abd Al-Aziz: "Much has been written about this. 150 Congressmen demanded an inquiry." Much has been written about it by crackpots like you! And 150 congressmen demanded an inquiry? You lying piece of shit, you know that that never happend! Arrrrghhhhhhh The sad part is that she is called a historian. Sigh...


At 6/14/2005 04:34:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Most probably, she is on heavy drugs :))

At 6/14/2005 07:07:00 AM, Blogger Cindy said...

Everybody knows that in the movies they blow up miniatures of the buildings. This means that one day the American Government will take off the invisa-ray they have on the WTC and you will see that NOTHING EVER HAPPENED TO THEM!!

Gary Johnston: Bak. Derk-derka ala. Derka derka, Mohammed Jihad. Baka sherpa-sherpa. Abaka-la.
Terrorist: Ohhh! Derka derka derka!

At 6/14/2005 07:45:00 AM, Anonymous mostafa said...

ROFL .... she is the best!

I know people who believe such crap.

Thanks, nice post BTW.

At 6/14/2005 09:25:00 AM, Blogger Huan said...

she forgot about the papal ninjas

At 6/14/2005 12:04:00 PM, Blogger ArmyArtilleryWife said...

I can't tell from just the words...is the host in agreement with her?

Anyway, my husband and several of my friends saw the planes fly into the towers in person.

I suppose the government brainwashed the thousands of people who witnessed this in person.

At 6/14/2005 12:24:00 PM, Blogger wa7ed mn masr said...


At 6/14/2005 03:27:00 PM, Blogger Rosebuds said...

From UPI:
A former Bush team member during his first administration is now voicing serious doubts about the collapse of the World Trade Center on 9-11. Former chief economist for the Department of Labor during President George W. Bush's first term Morgan Reynolds comments that the official story about the collapse of the WTC is "bogus" and that it is more likely that a controlled demolition destroyed the Twin Towers and adjacent Building No. 7. Reynolds, who also served as director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis in Dallas and is now professor emeritus at Texas A&M University said, "If demolition destroyed three steel skyscrapers at the World Trade Center on 9/11, then the case for an 'inside job' and a government attack on America would be compelling." Reynolds commented from his Texas A&M office, "It is hard to exaggerate the importance of a scientific debate over the cause of the collapse of the twin towers and building 7. If the official wisdom on the collapses is wrong, as I believe it is, then policy based on such erroneous engineering analysis is not likely to be correct either. The government's collapse theory is highly vulnerable on its own terms. Only professional demolition appears to account for the full range of facts associated with the collapse of the three buildings."

At 6/14/2005 09:58:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ha! rosebuds, I thought the Jews were guilty. Thank god you had a link to prove me wrong:)


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home