Ok, so first there was that college professor that told the Pro-US Kuwaiti student that he needs regular pyschotherapy for being an arab who loves America, and now there is another one who said that the 911 victims were not innocent people and that they had it coming. That it was another case of the chickens coming home to roost. Churchill's essay argues that the Sept. 11 attacks were in retaliation for the Iraqi children killed in a 1991 U.S. bombing raid and by economic sanctions imposed on Iraq by the United Nations following the Persian Gulf War. Ok, so there goes the first sign of nutty liberalism: Blame America First! The essay contends the hijackers who crashed airplanes into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on Sept. 11 were "combat teams," not terrorists. It states: "The most that can honestly be said of those involved on Sept. 11 is that they finally responded in kind to some of what this country has dispensed to their people as a matter of course." Second sign of Nutty liberalism: Defend the enemy who tried to kill you! The essay maintains that the people killed inside the Pentagon were "military targets." What about the people inside the hijacked plane man? They weren't working for the pentagon. They were merely traveling.Or how about the ones in the World Trade center nutbag? Are those military targets as well?